In plaintiffs’ suit against their former dentist and others for allegedly disclosing their and their minor children’s confidential medical information in violation of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, trial court’s rulings sustaining defendant’s demurrer on certain causes of action and dismissing certain claims is affirmed as, although the causes of action at issue are not impermissibly vague or confusing, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act preempts plaintiffs’ claims against defendant.
Read Brown v. Mortensen, No. B199793 [HTML]
Read Brown v. Mortensen, No. B199793 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 29, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Chaney
CounselFor Appellant: Law Offices of Robert A. Brown, Robert A. Brown; Law Offices of Lyle F. Middleton and Lyle F. Middleton
For Appellee: Carlson & Messer, David J. Kaminski and Stephen A. Watkins
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
