Petition by writ of mandate seeking to vacate an order disqualifying plaintiff from serving as attorneys for any party in the probate action pending before the trial court is granted where the court erred in finding that the law firm had a conflict of interest in representing both the executor and the beneficiary under the circumstances presented.
Read Baker Manock & Jensen v. Superior Court of Fresno County, No. F056973 in PDF
Read Baker Manock & Jensen v. Superior Court of Fresno County, No. F056973 in HTML
Appellate InformationORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of mandate. Debra J. Kazanjian, Judge.FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICTFiled July 22, 2009
JudgesBefore VARTABEDIAN, Acting P.J., HILL, J., KANE, J.Opinion by VARTABEDIAN, Acting P.J.
CounselFor Petitioner: Robie & Matthai, Edith R. Matthai and Steven S. Fleischman.For Real Party in Interest: Chielpegian Law Offices, Elliott D. Chielpegian, Michael S. Chielpegian and Lee S. W. Cobb.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
