In a breach of contract action brought pursuant to the Tucker Act, Court of Federal Claims judgment is reversed and remanded where the court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim, as the effective date of a surety bond is not necessarily the date of agreement or acquiescence within the meaning of 13 C.F.R. sec. 115.19(e).
Read Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. US, No. 08-5188
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims. Decided June 29, 2009
JudgesBefore NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.Opinion by DYK, Circuit Judge.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Jefferson B. Slagle, Thompson, Slagle & Hannan, LLC, Duluth, Georgia. For Defendant: Sean M. Dunn, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
