Order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s action for a tax refund is affirmed where writing or reforming Revenue and Taxation Code sec. 24402 to sever its invalid portion would not be consistent with the enacting legislature’s intent and would contradict the purpose of its enactment, and therefore would be inappropriate for the present court to rewrite or reform.
Read Abbott Laboratories v. Franchise Tax Board, No. B204210 in PDF
Read Abbott Laboratories v. Franchise Tax Board, No. B204210 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Irving S. Feffer, Judge. Affirmed.SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREEFiled July 21, 2009
JudgesBefore KITCHING J., KLEIN, P.J., ALDRICH, J. Opinion by KITCHING J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Baker & McKenzie, J. Pat Powers, Tod L. Gamlen, Jerry Salcido and Scott L. Brandman.For Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Felix E. Leatherwood and Brian D. Wesley, Deputy Attorneys General.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
